Tata Communications compared to NGENIX

On this page you can find an overview of the features and pricing of Tata Communications and NGENIX. We hope this helps you compare these two Content Delivery Networks. You can find additional tips that help you select the right CDN here.

Fully supported Partially supported Additional costs Not supported Unknown
Features Tata Communications NGENIX
PoPs 400+ 20+
Purge All Unknown Fully supported
Instant Purge Unknown Fully supported
Control panel Fully supported Fully supported
Origin Push Not supported Fully supported
Origin Pull Fully supported Fully supported
Origin Shield Unknown Fully supported
GZIP Compression Fully supported Fully supported
Custom Rules Unknown Fully supported
HTTP/2 Protocol Not supported Fully supported
SPDY Protocol Not supported Fully supported
Raw Access Logs Unknown Fully supported
Real time statistics Unknown Fully supported
Online signup Not supported Not supported
API Unknown Fully supported
Custom CNAMEs Fully supported Fully supported
Shared SSL Certificates Fully supported Fully supported
Custom SSL Certificates Fully supported Additional costs
Wildcard SSL Certificates Fully supported Additional costs
Support 24/7/365 customer service 247 support
Video On Demand (VoD) Fully supported Fully supported
RTMP Streaming Fully supported Fully supported
Multiple CDNs Not supported Not supported
CDN balancing tech Not supported Fully supported
Storage Fully supported Fully supported

Pricing Tata Communications vs NGENIX

Tata Communications NGENIX
Global flat fee N/A N/A
NA/EU Traffic (low volume) N/A N/A
NA/EU Traffic (high volume) N/A N/A
APAC Traffic N/A N/A
LATAM Traffic N/A N/A
Extra costs N/A N/A

TATA COMMUNICATIONS Description

Tata Communications, a company of Indian multinational Tata Group, offers a CDN service with 400 points-of-presence (PoPs) on five continents, in 21 locations. Tata owns and operates an impressive network infrastructure, with their sub-terrestrial and sub-sea network spanning 700,000 kilometers - more than 17 times around the world. According to the company, 24% of the planet’s internet routes are on their network, which grants improved performance and flexibility.

In 2011, Tata Communications acquired BitGravity - a US-based CDN provider founded in 2006. BitGravity. The companies had been in a strategic alliance leading up to the acquisition, and the move was a logical next step for Tata Communications to improve its global CDN offering. Remnants of BitGravity can still be found, such as the Tata Communications CDN support portal.

Tata Communications offers a wide range of CDN features such as live streaming and video-on-demand (VOD), an out-of-the-box online video platform, site acceleration and software delivery. They also provide DDoS and security services, hosting, colocation and transit.

CDN clients of Tata Communications are, or have included NDTV, Quick Heal Technologies, Web18 (part of Network 18) and Nimbus Communications.

NGENIX Description

NGENIX is a Russian CDN and cloud provider that covers Russia (both West and Eeast), Ukraine and Kazakhstan. Currently their network counts 23 points-of-presence (PoPs) in 14 geographical locations, with plans to scale up to 30 PoPs in 2016. The company is a household name for CDN coverage in Russia, and they claim to be the largest provider in the country.

The company was founded in 2007 and is currently headquartered in Moscow. They have peering agreements with all the major providers in Russia, and have a wide coverage of Russia’s Internet audience.

NGENIX has an SLA of 99.4% with 247 support. Their Control Panel is named NGENIX MultiDesk and includes real-time analytics and content consumption statistics.

Clients of NGENIX are, or have been Yandex, Nissan, Vogue, Metro News, Dr.Web, Yves Rocher, GQ, OZON.ru, Sapato, MyToys, Quelle, RIA Novosti, All-Russia State Television and Radio Broadcasting Company / VGTRK, Tatler and Russia Sport. The company also organised the broadcasting of the Olympic Games in 2010, 2012 and 2014, as well as the World Cup and European Cup in the same years, and the Eurovision Song Contest 2015.

Top comparisons

Make your own comparison

Got questions, or need help?

Get in touch!